In Iceland and Greenland: A Millennium of Perceptions, Sumarliði R. Ísleifsson
provides a comprehensive overview of outsider images of Iceland and
Greenland, how these were created, and how they subsequently developed.
Despite the two countries and peoples being quite dissimilar to one another, the
images that have arisen are similar in nature. Both islands are presented as
being endowed with a certain strangeness or otherness, rooted in so-called
Borealism, an exoticization of the Far North as seen from the Western European
centre. This strangeness can take many shapes according to Sumarliði.
Portrayals of Icelanders and Greenlanders can be contradictory, leading to them
being at the same time primitive, immoral, ugly, wild, developed, wise, enticing,
and cultivated. Sumarliði aims to establish the common thread that ties all these
disparate images together, namely an exoticization of the (Arctic) North, by
surveying the development of the discourses surrounding Iceland and
Greenland from the Middle Ages up to the twenty-first century.
Sumarliði is one of the leading scholars when it comes to the discursive
construction of Iceland, building his analyses on theories of postcolonialism,
discourse analysis, and imagology. The discursive deconstruction that
Sumarliði undertakes clearly takes its inspiration from Edward Said’s pivotal
work Orientalism (1978), which opened new avenues in the field of
postcolonialism in regard to the social construction of a region and the
interplay between knowledge and power. Sumarliði’s work has been crucial to
the application of this framework to the North, and Iceland in particular. He
draws upon the contributions of numerous scholars concerning the imaginings
and “essence” of the North, such as Gísli Pálsson, Kristinn Schram, and Juha
Ridanpää. Sumarliði, however, has been keen to integrate the theoretical
framework of imagology, a field rather uncommon outside of Western Europe,
where the focus is on cross-national perceptions of people groups as expressed
in literature. All in all, the book can be seen as a synthesis of Sumarliði’s work
on the two countries to date, combining insights from his previous publications
into one comprehensive overview.
The book explores four main time periods during which key developments
take place in the discourses and images surrounding Iceland and Greenland: the
Middle Ages to 1500, 1500 to 1750, 1750 to 1900, and finally 1900 to the present
day. Sumarliði begins with an extensive introduction to his methodological
framework and the discursive tendencies regarding the North in general, which
form the basis for his subsequent analysis of Iceland and Greenland. The
remainder of the book is dedicated to discussing primary sources by foreign
writers about Iceland and Greenland, irrespective of whether they actually
visited these islands, and placing them in a discursive, historical, and cultural
context. His analysis covers accounts of Iceland and Greenland and their
inhabitants in scholarly and literary works, with latter sections of the book
having a distinct focus on travelogues. Iceland and Greenland are shown to be
imagined in similar ways, although he identifies a gradual divergence from the
nineteenth century onwards whereby Iceland slowly becomes integrated into a
European cultural understanding whilst Greenland is pushed farther out into
the realm of the exotic and the colonial.
Iceland and Greenland is an adaption of the Icelandic-language original Í
fjarska norðursins: Ísland og Grænland—viðhorfasaga í þúsund ár, originally
published in 2020. It has been well-adapted for an Anglophone audience by
translator Julian Meldon D’Arcy. While it is assumed that readers are at least
somewhat acquainted with the two countries discussed, the work takes care to
guide the reader through the necessary historical and cultural background in
order to make sense of the images under discussion. Very culturally specific
discussions from the original are omitted or replaced by more general ones. The
cited sources also differ between the two different books, with the English
adaption including more English-language primary sources than the original.
This, however, is more of a strength than a weakness, demonstrating an
awareness that its Anglophone audience has a different cultural understanding
than its Icelandic one, and as such the book either leaves out or adds
information where necessary.
The book is clearly written for the layman, using quite accessible language
and extensively explaining the theoretical frameworks and scholarly terms to
allow any reader to understand the image deconstruction taking place. This
does sometimes mean that analysis of primary sources can feel shallow and
underdeveloped, as some of the specifics have been left out for the sake of
brevity and clarity. This, however, is not necessarily a great fault given that the
book discusses a rather small niche within the field of Scandinavian Studies
(and likewise within the fields of postcolonial studies and imagology). The
book’s accessibility makes it an ideal work for anyone setting out to explore
perceptions of Iceland and Greenland for scholarly purposes, filling in the gaps
for anyone approaching the book from a broader background. It is first and
foremost a comprehensive overview of Sumarliði’s own scholarship. Its core
strengths lie precisely therein, showcasing the presumed origins of dominant
discourses and their subsequent transformations. The many layers of discourse
on places as heavily fantasized about as Greenland and Iceland are thus
uncovered, permitting readers to see each addition to these narratives and
when they entered the picture.
Sumarliði’s research has been uniquely important to understanding
perceptions of Iceland and Greenland, and the book is a great introduction to
his work on the topic, both for scholars interested in this specific convergence
of themes and non-scholars interested in how Iceland and Greenland are
presented in the media. While it does lack depth at points, it compensates for
this by being a vital and comprehensive overview of how images of Iceland and
Greenland were constructed, reiterated, and developed over the past
millennium—shedding light on a small but fascinating area of study.